africajilo.blogg.se

1. MACRO VS MICRO LENS FULL
2. MACRO VS MICRO LENS PRO
3. MACRO VS MICRO LENS SOFTWARE
4. MACRO VS MICRO LENS PROFESSIONAL
5. MACRO VS MICRO LENS MAC

This is the shortest distance at which the lens can focus. When searching for the best macro lens, you’ll notice that they come with a minimum focus distance.

If you have a lower lens ratio like 1:2, that same bumble bee will only be 12.5mm on your camera sensor. For example, if you’re photographing a bumble bee that is 25mm long, that bee will actually be 25mm long on your camera’s sensor. What Makes The Best Nikon Close Up Lens? Macro Lens RatiosĬhoosing a macro lens with a 1:1 lens ratio allows you to get closer to your subject and capture it at true life size. And weighing only 0.78 lbs means a lighter travel experience and less chance for your macro lens to make your camera unsteady while mounted on a mini tripod. The Silent Wave Motor (SWM) technology means your lens focusing will stay quiet enough not to scare away your wildlife subjects.

MACRO VS MICRO LENS PROFESSIONAL

Your macro images will be clearer than ever with Nikon’s professional quality VR II (Vibration Reduction) image stabilization system. The Nikon AF-S DX Micro Nikkor 85mm f/3.5G ED is perfect for close up, nature and portrait photography. Nikon AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 85mm f/3.5G ED

Sigma 180mm F2.8 EX APO DG HSM OS Macro.Nikon AF-S FX Micro-NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8G ED.

MACRO VS MICRO LENS FULL

Rokinon 100mm F2.8 ED UMC Full Frame Telephoto Macro.Nikon AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 85mm f/3.5G ED.Ideally, the object would be sitting on a microscope slide tray that you could move tiny increments with the adjustment screws. Without touching the camera, I scoot the object closer and closer until it is in focus on the monitor.

MACRO VS MICRO LENS SOFTWARE

Then I use some simple software that allows me to release the shutter through a push of the space bar.

MACRO VS MICRO LENS MAC

I hook the camera up to the mac with a cable. One trick I use is to place the camera on a tripod or sit it on a nice level surface. With microscopes, you pretty much get a 2D DoF, that is "none". My simplistic rule of thumb is that less power = more depth of field. Through experimentation, I have a pretty good idea which lens I want to use, with which camera, to get a desired result.

I have 4 or 5 lenses I use for my micro/macro images. When we get to this range between micro and macro, DoF is very shallow no matter what you use. This becomes tricky as telescope lenses have different systems of labeling lenses than camera lenses. Thanks, Kaptin! Depth of field, as you undoubtedly know, is a function of magnification, f/stop, and aperture. My photography master was so decided that he got a discarded ST-701 just to get the velvety internal coating material to re-coat or line the interior of his trusty Nikon-F, because the flat paint inside the Nikon was actually of a dark gray color, but the velvety material of the FUJICA was much better at avoiding and supressing internal reflections, making it better than factory new! So, if you can, get a very black velvet piece to line the interior of the lens barrel but beware, test it to see if it sheds any fiber, because the sensor on digital cameras attract all dust or fibers by electrostatic charge, and not all cameras have sensor cleaning mechanisms! Good luck. They found that "body" flare was produced by the inside of the camera box surfaces, and the best camera body of all the ones tested was the FUJICA ST-701, which was not better than their Canon or Nikon equivalents generaly speaking, but where it was REALLY OUTSTANDING, was its freedom from internal reflections, owing to its absolutely better internal coating, which was made of a kind of "plush" or "Velvet" fabric, with a lot of short piles which absorb the light better than ANY so called flat paints. Those were lit and were extremely bright against the background, and subjected the camera and lens to a very difficult test different cameras and lenses were tried. the test set-up consisted of four long fluorescent tubes arrranged in the periphery of the visual field, jus outside of the visual frame. He was suscribed to many Photo Magazines, in one of them (I believe it was a "Modern Photography" issue from probably 1972 or so), there was an extremely well written article, kind of a review where several top quality 35 mm SLR cameras were being tested for "flare resistance".

MACRO VS MICRO LENS PRO

Many tears ago y was very involved in Photography, working as a helper for a Pro Advertizing Photographer.